Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have recently sparked significant discussion with their decision to change the surname of their two children to Sussex.
According to Dr. Carole Lieberman, a prominent American psychiatrist, this move reveals a deeper attempt to maintain ties to the British royal family.
The couple’s new surname aligns with their recent brand reconfiguration, where Sussex.com has replaced their previous site, Archewell.com.
This shift is intended to offer fans and followers more intimate glimpses into their lives and endeavors.
Instead of being called Mountbatten-Windsor, their children—Archie and Lilibet—are now officially recognized as Archie Sussex and Lilibet Sussex, a transformation that happened following King Charles‘s Coronation in May 2023.
Dr. Lieberman criticizes the Sussexes, describing this strategy as “desperate.”
Speaking on GBN America, she emphasized that Harry and Meghan are clinging to their royal connections as a response to declining popularity.
This shift has opened them up to considerable scrutiny, particularly regarding their motivations.
Interestingly, the royal children of Prince William and Catherine, the Princess of Wales, retain their royal titles even at school, being known as George, Charlotte, and Louis Cambridge.
This has led to backlash against Harry and Meghan’s use of their titles on the new Sussex.com site, prompting some commentators to call for the complete revocation of their royal titles.
Petronella Wyatt, a royal commentator, suggests that withdrawing the Sussex titles would paradoxically enhance their brand image.
By branding themselves simply as “Prince and Princess of Sussex,” they could shift perceptions and perhaps stabilize their public status.
Dr. Lieberman contends that Meghan’s actions are fueled by a sense of desperation.
She argues that the couple’s popularity has plunged, with Meghan increasingly leaning into her royal ties to regain stature in the public eye.
During the GBN America segment, host Mark Dolan termed this behavior as “crazy double standards.”
Harry and Meghan have invested years in critiquing the Royal Family yet still seek to capitalize on their titles.
When asked about the perceived hypocrisy of their actions, Dr. Lieberman readily concurred, stating that Meghan appears adamant about maintaining her visibility.
She elaborated that Meghan’s ambition is to remain prominent in the media spotlight daily, while Harry often seems more passive, acting as a supporting character rather than a lead.
Their dynamics, according to Dr. Lieberman, suggest a deeper dependency.
Meghan often seeks Harry’s support, visually portraying a neediness that contrasts with Harry’s demeanor.
“She needs him,” Doctor Lieberman remarks, hinting at how this need reflects their complicated relationship with royal lineage.
The light of scrutiny shines even more brightly on this couple as they navigate their celebrity lives.
As Harry and Meghan attempt to redefine their identities and brand in the wake of royal traditions, responses from the public remain mixed.
While some fans continue to support their endeavors, a growing faction questions their sincerity and motivations.
One can’t help but wonder—does the change in surname reflect a quest for legitimacy, or is it merely a marketing strategy?
In the whirlwind of their fame, are they solidifying their identity or merely searching for a fleeting grasp on royal influence?
The answers remain elusive, hidden behind the façade of celebrity life.
As the world watches this saga unfold, conversations about the significances of tradition, title, and identity in the royal narrative persist.
Harry and Meghan, with their recent branding shift, are at the heart of a debate that touches on legacy, loyalty, and personal branding in the modern era.
Despite their efforts to redefine themselves, the question lingers: will this move strengthen their connection to their royal heritage, or will it ultimately backfire and disrupt their attempts to carve a niche outside the monarchy’s shadow?
The upcoming months will be crucial in revealing whether this strategy will restore their standing or further alienate them from the very institution they seem to want to distance themselves from.
Read more
