Meet Simon Charles Dorante-Day, a man proclaiming to be the clandestine offspring of none other than King Charles III and Queen Camilla.
This British-born individual has reignited his controversial claims through social media, asserting that he deserves clarity regarding his lineage.
In a recent Facebook post, Dorante-Day has taken it a step further by insisting on a four-way paternity test—a demand he believes is necessary to unveil what he describes as a web of secrets spun by the British monarchy.
In a visual statement, he compared his facial features with those of King Charles, Prince William, and Prince Harry, presenting evidence he believes supports his argument.
“The left side of my face mirrors Charles’s perfectly, while neither William nor Harry’s features align,” he pointed out, which leads him to question, “So who really are Charles’s sons?”
It’s a provocative claim that has resonated with his 29,000 social media followers.
Dorante-Day and his wife, Dr. Elvianna, are spearheading this push for genetic testing, which they believe is the only solution to uncover the truth.
He claims that a significant cover-up has been in place for almost six decades, involving not only the monarchy but various establishments.
“The dishonesty and manipulation must be brought to light as what they truly are—criminal acts,” he emphasized.
His Facebook bio reflects his quest for truth, referring to himself as someone searching for his “natural birth parents,” whom he asserts are Charles and Camilla.
He poses thought-provoking questions to his audience: “What if the revelations could shake the very foundations of the monarchy?
Would people still support them?” This challenge echoes throughout his posts, which consistently highlight a narrative of personal discovery intertwined with royal intrigue.
Born in Portsmouth in 1966 and adopted shortly after his arrival, Dorante-Day claims a family connection rooted deep within royal corridors.
He asserts that his adoptive mother, who served Queen Elizabeth II, revealed on her deathbed that he was indeed a child of the monarchy.
At the time of his birth, Charles was just 17, and Camilla was 18.
In earlier posts, he speculated about the timeline of Charles and Camilla’s relationship, suggesting they were connected in the mid-1960s, contradicting popular belief that they began their romance later on.
He also pointed out a peculiar fact: Camilla’s apparent withdrawal from public life around the time of his birth, which he interprets as a suspicious gesture to maintain secrecy.
Dorante-Day finds it crucial to pursue this four-way paternity test to settle the uncertainty once and for all.
With the impending visit of King Charles and Queen Camilla to Australia, he has announced his intention to confront them directly.
His bold strategy may raise eyebrows, especially considering his recent placement on a security watchlist—a precaution due to his provocative claims and potential intentions.
As the royal couple prepares for a tour in Australia and Samoa, Dorante-Day has hinted at plans for a face-to-face meeting upon their arrival.
“What actions will I take?
Well, it’d be unwise to disclose everything in advance,” he suggested, adding a layer of suspense to an already charged situation.
Concerns for security have been heightened not just for Dorante-Day but for the royal couple as well.
Reports have revealed that he is among a list of individuals monitored by royal protection services, particularly those who pose a public stir.
Background checks and psychological evaluations are standard for anyone associated with possible threats to royals.
Dorante-Day’s conviction extends beyond his personal seeking of identity; he has also initiated legal proceedings against the Queensland Police Service, accusing them of neglecting their responsibilities toward adopted individuals like himself and failing to support his attempts at uncovering the truth.
“My fight centers on the rights of an adopted child, which should persist through their life.
It seems these rights are overlooked, and the police are failing their duty of care,” he remarked, linking his personal narrative with broader issues concerning adoption and transparency within the system.
Read more
