Amid a legal battle in a US court, the Biden administration’s attorney has refuted claims that Prince Harry’s memoir, titled “Spare,” serves as definitive evidence of his alleged drug use.

The Duke of Sussex’s visa status is under scrutiny, with a conservative think tank pushing for the release of his US immigration records.

In his memoir, Prince Harry, aged 39, openly acknowledged past drug use involving marijuana, cocaine, and psychedelic mushrooms.

Such disclosures could potentially impact his eligibility for a US visa, posing a threat to his immigration standing in the country.

The Heritage Foundation, through a lawsuit filed against the Department of Homeland Security under the Freedom of Information Act, has raised concerns about potential preferential treatment in Prince Harry’s visa application process.

The Department of Homeland Security mandates visa applicants to disclose any history of drug use, a factor that could influence their immigration approval.

The ongoing legal dispute revolves around the clash between the Heritage Foundation’s push for transparency and the Biden administration’s stance on safeguarding the privacy rights of visa applicants.

The Heritage Foundation argues that Prince Harry’s extensive revelations in his memoir strip away his entitlement to privacy by commercializing intimate aspects of his personal life.

Advocates from both sides presented their arguments during the court hearing, with John Bardo, representing the Biden administration, emphasizing that statements made in a book like Prince Harry’s memoir do not automatically equate to factual evidence.

Bardo stressed the distinction between literary expressions and legal testimony, cautioning against assuming the veracity of all written claims.

The Heritage Foundation continues to advocate for the public disclosure of Prince Harry’s immigration records, anticipating an official ruling on the matter.

Nile Gardiner, director of the Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom, expressed support for transparent governance and accountability from the Biden administration, characterizing the case as a pivotal moment for upholding these principles.

Against this backdrop, the Biden administration underscores the importance of upholding