Fresh allegations have arisen about Meghan Markle‘s conduct, prompting renewed scrutiny into a series of complaints regarding her treatment of staff. The most recent source of concern stems from reports that she reportedly shouted at a florist for a staggering 30 minutes, leading the florist to vow never to work with her again.
An insider spoke to The Sunday Times, shedding light on what it’s like to work for the Duchess of Sussex. Their account described a work environment where employees felt as if they were being treated poorly, akin to how one might treat a tradesman. “They promised they would never work with her again, regardless of the prestige attached to her name as a client,” the source noted. This is far from an isolated incident; numerous ex-employees have shared their accounts of discomfort while working with Markle.
In a previous exposé by The Hollywood Reporter, several staff members described the atmosphere under Markle’s direction as one filled with fear. “Everyone’s scared of Meghan. She has a tendency to belittle others and dismiss any advice,” claimed an anonymous source. It seems that both Markle and her husband, Prince Harry, are often viewed as impulsive decision-makers, with Harry often seen as a charismatic enabler.
Participants have recounted disturbing episodes during their tenure, with one ex-employee stating, “She carries herself like a dictator in high heels, barking orders and creating a tense atmosphere.” The implications of her behavior are severe, as some have claimed to have witnessed grown men visibly shaken, even brought to tears by her actions.
These allegations aren’t new. Back in 2018, Buckingham Palace investigated claims of Markle’s rude behavior towards royal aides, shedding light on her challenging interactions with staff. The situation seemed to worsen recently when job changes occurred within the team that supported the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, particularly the departure of Josh Kettler, who played a pivotal role in guiding Harry during a transitional phase in his life.
Yet, Markle’s representatives defended her vigor, categorizing the reports as part of a “calculated smear campaign” fueled by incorrect information. “This defamatory portrayal is disappointing and biased,” a spokesperson explained. Furthermore, they implied that these allegations emerged coincidentally just before Markle and Harry were set to share their truthful account of their experiences.
The florist incident added a dramatic layer to the ongoing narrative surrounding Markle. Reports claim she “screamed down the phone” at the florist, who was allegedly involved in creating a floral arrangement. The florist later took to the internet to share their displeasure regarding the interaction but never identified Markle explicitly as a client.
This drama unfolds at a time when Markle is gearing up for the spotlight with the launch of a new cookery show and related cookbook as part of her American Riviera Orchard brand. Yet, a former courtier described her behavior during her time with the Sussexes as marked by uncomfortable moments, suggesting a polarizing personality.
Amidst these allegations, controversy was sparked when Meghan’s defenders surfaced, asserting her to be an exemplary employer in a piece by Us Weekly. Five different sources came forward to support her character. However, skeptics quickly dismissed this portrayal as a PR maneuver, indicating the article could be an attempt to counteract the negative press.
Meanwhile, speculation has circulated regarding the high turnover in Markle’s team. The departures of several key personnel, including charity leaders and production managers, cast a shadow over her management style. With the recent exodus of high-profile employees, questions arise about the sustainability of Markle and Harry’s professional endeavors.
As the Sussexes face ongoing scrutiny regarding their operations and interpersonal dynamics, many remain divided in their opinions. Time will reveal how Meghan Markle chooses to navigate these challenges while pursuing her career and personal ambitions.
Read more
