Prince Harry’s choice to stay at a hotel instead of a royal residence has been unveiled by his ex-butler, Grant Harrold, who served King Charles for more than seven years.

In an exclusive interview with The Post, Harrold shed light on the Duke’s reasoning.

He noted that it was peculiar for Prince Harry not to utilize the accommodations available at Clarence House or Highgrove, where he had rooms while growing up.

The ex-butler speculated that Prince Harry might have wanted to demonstrate his independence by supporting himself through his hotel stay, indicating a sense of self-sufficiency.

While this decision showcases Prince Harry’s maturity in taking care of his finances, Harrold expressed concerns regarding the security implications.

He remarked that staying at a royal residence would have provided pre-existing security measures, unlike a hotel where additional security arrangements would be necessary.

Harrold highlighted the contrast in security arrangements, emphasizing that if Prince Harry had chosen a royal residence, security personnel would have been readily available.

However, opting for a hotel necessitates the provision of a dedicated security team for his protection.

The former butler questioned the logic behind Prince Harry’s choice, pointing out the potential risks associated with arranging personal security outside the protective environment of a royal residence.

By asserting his financial