Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are under scrutiny once more following their announcement of an unofficial royal tour to Colombia later this year.
Critics are taking aim at the couple, suggesting that their trip reeks of manipulation involving King Charles and the royal family.
The invitation to visit Colombia has come from the country’s Vice President, Francia Marquez, who welcomed the couple to explore the vibrant cities of Bogota, Cartagena, and Cali.
This trip, scheduled for a later date in 2023, follows the Sussexes’ recent four-day jaunt to Nigeria, which was also described as an “unofficial diplomatic” visit.
Angela Levin, a royal commentator and notorious critic of the couple, wasted no time in labeling the Colombia visit as irresponsible.
She questioned the wisdom of their decision, especially in light of Harry’s previous claims about the dangers of returning to the UK due to alleged safety concerns.
Levin pointed out that current conditions in Colombia are hazardous, mentioning a troubling trend of kidnappings for ransom in the country.
During an interview with GB News, she stated, “It is dangerous there at the moment,” pointing to ongoing security risks that contradict Harry’s reluctance to return to British soil.
The journalist’s critiques went further.
She argued that the Sussexes’ acceptance of the Colombian invitation contradicts Harry’s higher-profile legal battles against the British Home Office regarding security.
This, according to Levin, adds a layer of inconsistency to Harry’s safety claims, calling into question the authenticity of his arguments in court.
“Accepting a trip to a country known for its safety issues raises eyebrows,” Levin said, implying that the Duke’s reasons for avoiding the UK may not hold water.
She expressed disbelief at how Harry and Meghan seem to navigate their circumstances while seeking protections akin to those reserved for senior royals.
At the heart of the issue lies Harry’s ongoing court case against the British government, which addresses the removal of the taxpayer-funded security detail.
He argues that this change has left him and his family vulnerable and unable to visit his home safely.
This Colombia tour might further complicate matters for the British Home Office.
There are growing concerns that the unofficial forays of the Sussexes could overshadow the official duties carried out by the royal family.
A royal insider recently conveyed to the Mirror that King Charles is exploring discreet channels to manage how often the couple receives such invites, noting, “That will prove very difficult.” The balancing act between maintaining royal protocols and navigating the public appeal of Harry and Meghan is growing more complex.
Meanwhile, there is palpable anxiety within palace circles regarding Meghan’s potential to attract public attention.
The rebellious nature she has displayed might just position her as a more fascinating figure than those members of the royal family who consistently toe the line.
It seems the Sussexes find themselves at a pertinent crossroad, where royal tradition clashes with personal ambition.
Critics argue that their actions could undermine the monarchy’s stability while displaying a significant degree of risk-taking on their part.
The public awaits to see how King Charles and the royal family will respond to this latest chapter in Harry and Meghan’s journey.
Will they act to curb future invitations, or is this just the beginning of an era where non-traditional royal engagements become the norm?
The controversy surrounding the Colombian visit not only highlights the couple’s ongoing struggles but also raises questions about their place within the royal family.
It’s a complex narrative where safety, public perception, and familial ties intertwine, leaving many to ponder if this is simply the new face of royalty in the modern age.
Read more
