New revelations from a gripping biography suggest that Prince William took a firm stance against Meghan Markle donning any jewelry previously owned by his mother, the beloved Princess Diana, on her wedding day.
This insight adds another dimension to the complexities surrounding the Duchess of Sussex’s integration into the royal family.
According to royal expert Robert Jobson in his newly released book, the disapproval from William was rooted in his apprehensions about Harry’s swift courtship with Meghan.
Sources close to the royal family indicate that William was not entirely on board with his brother’s choice, promoting the idea that Meghan should take more time to adapt to royal customs before taking on the significant commitment of marriage.
Jobson details that before their union at St. George’s Chapel in May 2018, William sought assurances from Queen Elizabeth II regarding the exclusion of Diana’s iconic jewels from Meghan’s nuptials, despite being permitted for Catherine, his wife.
This underscores the possessiveness William felt towards their late mother’s treasured possessions and hints at a deeper concern for the familial ties.
Having been in a long-term relationship with Kate Middleton prior to their marriage, William reportedly struggled with the rapid development of Harry and Meghan’s romance, which began just thirteen months after they first met in June 2016.
The concern grew as they announced their engagement later that year, raising questions about the readiness of Meghan to step into royal life.
The fallout from William’s disapproving stance was significant.
According to Harry’s memoir, “Spare,” the camaraderie between the brothers began to fray, with hints of escalating tensions preceding the wedding that left lasting scars on their relationship.
Harry perceived his brother’s suggestions as overly critical, which only led to further alienation.
Adding fuel to the fire, Meghan’s early interactions with the royal family were fraught with misinterpretations and awkward moments.
Jobson illustrates an incident where Meghan, in a moment of casualness, borrowed Catherine’s lip gloss, leading to an unexpected response from the Duchess, who was reportedly taken aback.
The divide between Sussexes and the rest of the royal family has widened significantly since Harry and Meghan stepped back from their royal duties in 2020.
The term “Fab Four,” once used to describe the couples, now feels like a distant memory, overshadowed by discord and estrangement.
Claims regarding Meghan’s treatment by the royal institution have stirred significant media attention, particularly after their candid interviews revealing their struggles within the monarchy.
One of the most poignant allegations was made during a televised conversation with Oprah Winfrey, where the couple mentioned troubling discussions regarding the potential skin tone of their future offspring.
Jobson discusses how this sentiment led to a deeper investigation and controversy surrounding the royal family’s behavior, with later publications pinpointing specific family members, including King Charles and Kate, as participants in these troubling discussions.
Additionally, reports of disagreements on more mundane subjects, such as travel safety, surfaced in Jobson’s book.
In an unexpected turn of events, Charles confronted William over his family’s use of helicopters, leading to a tense exchange.
The king, prioritizing safety, required his son to formally acknowledge the risks, adding another layer to the complicated family dynamics.
Despite the tumultuous nature of their relationship, Meghan’s wedding day oozed with its own unique glow.
Although she didn’t wear Diana’s jewelry as she had wished, choosing the Queen Mary Diamond Bandeau tiara instead, she still incorporated elements connected to her mother-in-law.
Later during their reception, Meghan notably donned Diana’s stunning aquamarine cocktail ring, a thoughtful nod to her late mother-in-law.
This choice is a testament to the complexities of familial love, tradition, and acceptance within the royal family.
Read more
